Iaea investigates planned woomera nuclear dump on Iaea Island. Photo: John Davenport
window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push({ mode: ‘thumbnails-c’, container: ‘taboola-interstitial-gallery-thumbnails-45′, placement: ‘Interstitial Gallery Thumbnails 45′, target_type:’mix’ }); _taboola.push({flush: true});
Photo: John Davenport Image 1 of / 45 Caption Close Iaea Nuclear Power Plant’s first leak could cost millions of d더킹카지노ollars, environmental groups say 1 / 45 Back to Gallery
HISTORY CHANGES: IAAWP and Uptown Pacific say they’ve agreed to pay millions of dollars in cleanup costs for a leak at Iaea Island’s first nuclear power plant.
On March 8, 2016, about 4:50 p.m., workers noticed a large piece of concrete that could have been a leak pipe, said IAAWP President John G. Davenport. They immediately decided to test it, to make sure it was safe to leak. The plant’s electrical lines were not functioning as expected, so they installed a backup, a system that’s still going.
“That’s our plan,” said Davenport. “We’d be able to do what’s needed to deal with the damage, for the next nine months. I’m talking tens of millions of dollars, even hundreds of millions of dollars.”
In addition to the $3 million bill, IAAWP estimates it will incur between $13.1 million and $15 million in costs to restore power to the site.
Uptown Pacific, another major partner in IAAWP, is now working with IAAWP and the Port of San Francisco on a project to seal off the spillway by September.
As part of the agreement with Uptown Pacific and IAAWP, they will each receive $1 million toward their cleanup costs. Meanwhile, Uptown Pacific says it will provide up to $500,000 worth of technical assistance.
IAAWP says the cleanup at the site is already beginning to take effect and will cover more than 30 days, after which all work will have to stop.
The Uptown Pacific plan calls for work crews to repair the leak area that is우리카지노 in the process of being closed off, with contractors also being responsible for ensuring 카지노 사이트the spillway does not become an active hazardous material.
The Port of San Francisco says an additional 60 days will be needed for the project to take effec